Principles of Airborne Sound Insulation
These articles are inherently technical and ‘in-depth’ in nature. They are primarily intended for acoustic professionals and academics, but, this does not mean they are incomprehensible to non acousticians… so if you have a bit of time and want to understand acoustics in-depth, then please read on.
Alternatively, if you’re looking for something a little lighter, with less technical jargon, generally a bit easier to digest… take a look at some of our other articles, our A to Z, or some ‘bite-size‘ posts.
Got a question?
Is there an acoustic, noise, or vibration related topic or problem that you would like explained? Send us an email and we’ll write an article about it.
Principles of Airborne Sound Insulation
Sound insulation relates to the total ability of a building element or building structure to lower the sound transmission through it. Two types of sound insulation might be referred to – airborne sound insulation and impact sound insulation. It’s crucial to keep in mind that the weakest link in the construction has a large impact on the overall sound insulation.
For this article, we’re going to focus on airborne sound insulation.
The level of airborne sound insulation relies on the following general principles:
The efficiency of each strategy of insulation can vary with the kind of sound, however in the majority of constructions all the principles of insulation matter. Details of the principles are explained in the following sections.
For example, the typical SRI of a brick wall increases from 45 dB to 50 dB when the thickness is increased from 102.5 mm to 215 mm. This doubling of mass does not need to be achieved by a doubling of thickness as the mass of a wall for sound insulation purposes is specified by its surface density determined in kilograms per square metre (rather than per cubic metre). Concrete blocks of different densities can produce the very same surface area density by differing the densities of the blocks.
– The Mass Law states that the sound insulation of a single-leaf partition has a linear relationship with the surface density (mass per system area) of the partition, and increases with the frequency of the sound.
Windows and doors are necessary parts of a building however a knowledge of the uniformity concept can prevent effort being lost on the insulation of the wrong locations. To enhance the insulation of a composite structure the component with the most affordable insulation must be improved first off. Walls dealing with loud roads need to consist of the minimum of windows and doors, and they must be well insulated.
Any doubling of frequency is a change of one octave. For example, a brick wall provides about 10 dB more insulation against 400 Hz sounds than versus 100 Hz noises. This modification, from 100 to 200 Hz and after that 200 to 400 Hz, is a rise of two octaves.
Areas of lowered insulation or small gaps in the construction of a wall have a far greater effect on overall insulation than is usually appreciated. The completeness of a structure relies on airtightness and uniformity.
– Sound insulation increases by roughly 5 dB whenever the mass is doubled.
For increasing sound insulation typically involve increasing the thickness of masonry, plaster and glass. Where a construction does not obey the Mass Law it is due to the fact that other factors such as airtightness, stiffness and isolation have an effect.
Single-leaf construction includes composite construction such as plastered brickwork, as long as the layers are bonded together. Theory predicts an insulation increase of 6 dB for each doubling of mass, however for practical constructions the following working rule is preferable.
Typical air gaps:.
Wall– floor gaps.
Gaps around doors.
Poor window seals.
Unsealed pipe runs.
Unsealed cable runs.
Loss of insulation by resonance occurs if the event sound waves have the exact same frequency as the natural frequency of the partition. The increased vibrations that take place in the structure are handed down to the air therefore the insulation is reduced. Resonant frequencies are usually low and probably to trigger problem in the air areas of cavity construction.
The overall sound insulation of a construction is considerably reduced by small locations of poor insulation. An unsealed door occupying 25 per cent of the area of a half-brick wall lowers the average SRI of that wall from around 45 dB to 23 dB. The final sound insulation is affected by relative locations but is always closer to the insulation of the poorer part than to the better component.
The effectiveness of sound insulation depends upon frequency and the Mass Law likewise predicts the list below impact on frequency.
. Heavyweight structures with high mass transmit less sound energy than lightweight structures. The high density of heavyweight materials restricts the size of the sound vibrations inside the material so that the final face of the structure, such as the inside wall of a room, vibrates with less movement than for a light-weight material.
Flexible (non-stiff) materials, integrated with a high mass, are best for high sound insulation. Flexibility is not usually a preferable structural property in a wall or a floor.
Some materials might be likewise porous adequate to pass sound through the small holes in their structure; brick and blockwork need to for that reason be plastered or sealed. Doors and openable windows ought to be airtight when closed, and the type of sealing used to increase thermal insulation is also reliable for sound insulation.
– Sound insulation increases by about 5 dB whenever the frequency is doubled.
As insulation versus airborne sound is increased, the presence of gaps becomes more substantial. For instance, if a brick wall contains a hole or crack which in size represents only 0.1 per cent of the overall area of the wall, the average SRI of that wall is minimized from 50 dB to 30 dB.
100 Hz = bass note.
400 Hz– 2 kHz = voice.
Sound isolation is easily ruined by strong flanking transmissions through rigid links, even by a single nail. Cavity constructions need to be adequately broad for the air to be flexible, otherwise resonance and coincidence effects can cause the insulation to be minimized at specific frequencies.
As the sound is transformed to different wave motions at the junction of various materials, energy is lost and a helpful quantity of insulation is gained. Some broadcasting and concert buildings accomplish very high insulation by utilizing the completely discontinuous construction of a double structure separated by resilient mountings.
Due to the fact that the vibrations of this ‘loudspeaker’ effect are restricted, the amplitude of the acoustic waves re-radiated into the air is likewise restricted. A decrease in the amplitude of sound waves impacts the ‘strength’ or ‘loudness’ of a sound, it does not impact the frequency (pitch) of that sound.
Loss of insulation by coincidence is triggered by the flexing flexural vibrations, which can occur along the length of a partition. For several octaves above this critical frequency the sound insulation tends to stay continuous and less than that forecasted by the Mass Law.
Stiffness is a physical property of a partition and depends upon elements such as the elasticity of the materials and the repairing of the partition. High stiffness can trigger loss of insulation at specific frequencies where there are resonances and coincidence effects. These effects upset the predictions of the Mass Law.